Why Health Plans Must Treat Credentialing as a Strategic Provider Experience

For decades, credentialing has been viewed primarily as a compliance requirement designed to verify provider qualifications and protect patient safety. But today’s credentialing leaders are facing a very different reality. Health plans collected documentation, verified credentials, made participation decisions, and revisited those determinations during periodic recredentialing cycles.

Today, that approach is rapidly evolving.

New NCQA requirements, increasing provider expectations, growing delegated credentialing complexity, and heightened pressure around network adequacy are expanding the role of credentialing far beyond provider verification. At the same time, providers continue to experience one persistent challenge: lengthy administrative processes that delay participation in payer networks and postpone reimbursement.

Blog Key Takeaways

• Regulatory and provider demands are increasing credentialing complexity.
• The credentialing process plays a growing role in the provider experience.
• Providers care about network participation, not just credentialing approval.
• Credentialing delays can impact provider revenue, network growth, and access to care.
• Provider readiness is becoming the new measure of credentialing success.

As a result, leading health plans are beginning to rethink credentialing not simply as a verification process, but as an ongoing strategy for maintaining trusted provider information, supporting provider participation, and strengthening network integrity.

In this article, we’ll examine the forces reshaping credentialing and why health plans are starting to view credentialing as one of their most strategic provider interactions.

Why Is Provider Credentialing Becoming More Complex?

Credentialing has always required health plans to balance compliance and efficiency. What has changed is the number of competing priorities health plans are now expected to manage.

Today, credentialing sits at the intersection of regulatory oversight, network management, provider experience, and operational performance. Decisions made during credentialing can affect everything from audit readiness and network adequacy to provider satisfaction and member access to care.

Regulatory Expectations Continue to Evolve

The compliance landscape continues to become more dynamic.

NCQA’s growing emphasis on continuous monitoring is shifting organizations away from traditional episodic credentialing models and toward ongoing provider monitoring. At the same time, shorter verification windows and more rigorous audit and documentation requirements are increasing the demands placed on credentialing operations.

These changes require health plans to maintain live visibility into provider information while ensuring documentation remains accurate, defensible, and accessible throughout the credentialing lifecycle.

Health Plans Face Growing Network Pressures

At the same time, health plans are working to address network adequacy challenges, expand provider participation, and improve access to care.

Provider shortages in critical specialties and geographic regions have made it increasingly important to onboard and activate qualified providers efficiently. Every delay in the process creates challenges for network expansion efforts and ultimately impacts member access.

Provider Expectations Are Changing

Providers are also raising the bar. Many have little tolerance for repetitive paperwork, manual follow-up processes, and uncertainty about where they stand in the credentialing journey. Providers increasingly expect that once they have submitted accurate information, they won’t be required to repeatedly provide the same documentation across organizations or during every recredentialing cycle. They want confidence that their information remains current and that credentialing can be maintained through trusted data sources rather than redundant administrative effort.

Taken together, these trends are transforming the role of credentialing. Credentialing leaders are no longer managing a single workflow. They are balancing regulatory requirements, operational goals, network priorities, and provider expectations simultaneously. Among those competing priorities, one factor is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore: the provider experience itself.

As credentialing becomes more visible to providers, the way health plans manage the process can shape relationships long before a provider ever sees their first patient within the network.

Credentialing is a Critical Provider Experience

For many providers, credentialing represents their first meaningful interaction with a health plan. That first impression matters.

The credentialing process often shapes a provider’s perception of how easy or difficult it will be to work with an organization moving forward. It can influence opinions about a payer’s efficiency, responsiveness, and overall administrative experience before a provider sees a single patient within the network.

Unfortunately, providers often experience significant friction during the process. Duplicate document requests, limited visibility into application status, and time sitting in phone line queues can create frustration and uncertainty. Even when progress is being made behind the scenes, providers may feel disconnected from the process itself.

This often reveals an important disconnect between how health plans and providers define success.

Credentialing teams traditionally measure success through completed applications, verification activities, and committee approvals. Providers tend to view success much differently.

They are not asking whether their file has been approved. They are asking:

• When can I participate in the network?
• When can I begin seeing patients?
• When can I start submitting claims and getting paid?

Providers don’t experience credentialing as a compliance workflow. They experience it as the pathway to treat patients.

That distinction is important because it shifts the conversation from provider approval to something much more meaningful: provider readiness.

From Credentialing to Continuous Participation

For years, credentialing success has largely been measured by completion. An application is submitted. Verifications are conducted. Reviews are completed. Participation is approved. The file is closed. But approval does not automatically create participation, and participation itself is not a permanent state.

Even after credentialing is complete, health plans may still need to finalize enrollment requirements, activate systems, complete configuration activities, and satisfy other operational dependencies before a provider is fully ready to participate in the network. At the same time, provider eligibility can change at any moment due to licensure actions, sanctions, exclusions, disciplinary events, or medical malpractice coverage changes.

As a result, health plans are beginning to rethink what credentialing success truly means.

From the provider’s perspective, these distinctions matter very little. What matters is whether they can see patients, participate in the network, and submit reimbursable claims, and remain in good standing over time. This is why many health plans are beginning to think about credentialing differently.

This is why many health plans are shifting their focus beyond provider approval alone. First, they are working to improve provider readiness by helping qualified providers move from application to status upkeep more efficiently. At the same time, they are placing greater emphasis on maintaining continuous visibility into provider status to help ensure network participation can continue without interruption.

That shift has important implications.

Provider Readiness Powers Network Performance

When providers come into network faster and stay there, health plans may be better positioned to activate network capacity more quickly, easily maintain adequate networks, and improve member access to care. When they maintain ongoing confidence in provider eligibility, they may also strengthen compliance, improve audit readiness, reduce risk, and minimize disruptions across the provider lifecycle.

Conversely, delays can create ripple effects throughout the organization. They may contribute to provider dissatisfaction, increase operational escalations, create additional administrative work, and delay revenue opportunities. All of which informs providers’ opinions about how much they want to participate in a payer’s network.

For these reasons, credentialing is increasingly being evaluated based on its contribution to broader business outcomes.

Forward-thinking organizations are beginning to connect credentialing with enrollment, provider data management, network operations, and other downstream workflows rather than managing each process in isolation. Their goal is not simply to approve providers efficiently. Their goal is to help providers become ready to participate as quickly as possible and sustain approved status more automatically.

The result is a fundamental shift in how credentialing creates value. The goal is no longer simply provider approval. The goal is provider readiness and continuous participation.

Credentialing Success Shouldn’t End at Approval

Credentialing will always play a critical role in provider qualification, compliance, and patient safety.  But health plans are increasingly recognizing that maintaining a high-performing provider network requires much more than verifying credentials at specific moments in time.

The organizations leading the next generation of credentialing are focusing on a broader objective: maintaining confidence that providers remain qualified, compliant, and eligible to participate throughout the provider lifecycle.

As regulatory requirements evolve, provider expectations continue to rise, and network challenges become more complex, credentialing’s strategic importance will only continue to grow.

How Availity Can Help

For 25 years, Availity has operated at the intersection of providers, health plans, and the administrative workflows that connect them.

Through that experience, we’ve seen credentialing evolve from a compliance-driven process into a strategic driver of provider readiness. We believe credentialing should do more than verify qualifications. Modern credentialing should be designed to reduce administrative friction, enhance provider experiences, and help qualified providers move toward participation more efficiently.

That’s why we’re helping health plans rethink credentialing as part of a broader provider lifecycle strategy.

Across the industry, we’re seeing a common challenge: health plans are being asked to meet growing regulatory requirements while simultaneously improving provider experiences, strengthening network performance, and accelerating provider participation. Achieving those goals requires more than efficient workflows. It requires trusted provider information that can support the entire provider lifecycle.

The organizations leading this transformation are bringing together:

• Provider engagement
• Workflow integration
• Network scale
• Trusted connectivity
• Operational expertise

The market is moving beyond provider approval alone. The future belongs to organizations that can help qualified providers move from application to participation with greater speed, transparency, and confidence.

Because ultimately, the goal is no longer simply provider approval.

The goal is provider readiness.

Learn how Availity Credentialing is designed to support health plans streamline provider onboarding, enhance provider experiences, and advance provider readiness across the provider lifecycle.

LEARN MORE

About the Author

Curtis Miller is Vice President of Provider Lifecycle Solutions at Availity, where he works to reduce friction between payers and providers through more effective use of provider data. He brings a strong customer focus and deep healthcare expertise shaped by 12 years at Deloitte Consulting, where he led technology-enabled transformation initiatives for major healthcare organizations. Curtis holds degrees from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. He lives in Charlotte, North Carolina, with his wife and son. Outside of work, he enjoys cycling, photography, and learning French.